As to your quip . . . “Without the Highgate vampire case they wouldn’t be talking here at all”, etc, I rather think that relates more to yourself Anthony! You seem unable to talk about little else; notwithstanding its 40-year old history! It is YOURSELF who keeps incessantly referring to this case Anthony – almost like you’ve got some sort of obsession with it!Ok? You got that?
I am really not interested in that particular case anymore, Anthony, It is DEAD (excuse the pun!) there are far more many genuine cases of psychic phenomena to be investigated apart from that one!
See, that might be believable (hint: it's not) if David didn't go ahead and mention stuff like this:
Had a call earlier from a certain TV company again. Doing another interview on the Highgate case very soon. Will give more details a little later, although you’ll probably see it anyway.So much for letting its "40-year old history" go to rest.
It's also been nice to see JBC groveling to David over some misunderstanding involving lyrics in a blog entry's comments:
After I rumbled his little attempt at collusion, I added my own contribution. Whether or not it'll be published is another story:
I wonder what brand of cat food Dave feeds him? Does he sleep, curled up at the end of his bed or does he have his own basket?
Hope he's got a scratching post, at least. Although, that's probably what his blog's for.