Well, now even the warning blog entry's been deleted, as well as my comment asking him if he'd fess up to his plagiarism.
That comment was also deleted, and the Bishop's replaced it with this comment on his own "?" post:
As you can see, not only did he refuse to 'fess up to it, he's now falsely claiming that it falls under "abusive content" and suggests that I wrapped my comment in "innuendo and conjecture".
Talk about a wolf in sheep's clothing.
His failure to face up to his own actions, lie and engage in censorious activities is highly reminiscent of his archnemesis.
Here's what I posted after his comment:
As you can see, not only did he refuse to 'fess up to it, he's now falsely claiming that it falls under "abusive content" and suggests that I wrapped my comment in "innuendo and conjecture".
Talk about a wolf in sheep's clothing.
His failure to face up to his own actions, lie and engage in censorious activities is highly reminiscent of his archnemesis.
Here's what I posted after his comment:
Do you see anything "abusive" there? Is it "wrapped in innuendo and conjecture"?
I don't think so.
It goes without saying that the comment will most likely be deleted and unacknowledged. Thank goodness for the PrtScn button on the keyboard.
This'll be a testament showing the kind of dodgy practices the Bishop is willing to employ.
I don't think so.
It goes without saying that the comment will most likely be deleted and unacknowledged. Thank goodness for the PrtScn button on the keyboard.
This'll be a testament showing the kind of dodgy practices the Bishop is willing to employ.
No comments:
Post a Comment